← All posts

AccessiScan · 2026-04-21 · 7 min read

DOJ Title II Deadline Extended — What the April 2026 IFR Actually Says

On April 20, 2026 the U.S. Department of Justice published an Interim Final Rule (IFR) that extends the compliance deadlines of the Title II web and mobile accessibility rule by one year across the board. The substantive technical standard — WCAG 2.1 Level AA — is unchanged. This is extra runway for state and local governments, not a reprieve from the obligation.

The new deadline table

Entity sizeOld deadlineNew deadline (April 2026 IFR)
Public entities with 50,000 or more residents, and all non-special-district state / territorial entitiesApril 24, 2026April 26, 2027
Public entities with fewer than 50,000 residents, and all special district governmentsApril 26, 2027April 26, 2028

Why DOJ moved the deadlines

The IFR preamble cites three reasons:

  • Implementation-capacity concerns raised by small and mid-sized jurisdictions during the rule's 30-month implementation window.
  • Coordination with emerging standards work — the rule references WCAG 2.1 AA but the W3C has published WCAG 2.2. DOJ wants to allow jurisdictions to avoid re-work if they adopt the later version.
  • Vendor bandwidth. The market for procurement-grade WCAG audits at SMB price is still maturing; extending deadlines avoids a procurement squeeze.

What did NOT change

  • The technical standard. WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA remain the baseline. Jurisdictions may meet the obligation by conforming to WCAG 2.2 AA; 2.2 is a superset.
  • The scope. Every public-facing web page, web application, mobile app, and digital document maintained by a state or local entity.
  • The remediation expectation. The rule still expects fixed code, not overlay widgets. (See our overlay lawsuit guide for the litigation record on widget-based compliance attempts.)
  • The documentation expectation. Conformance should be evidenced via a VPAT 2.5 Accessibility Conformance Report, kept current as the site evolves.

What this means for your procurement timeline

Large jurisdictions (50,000+)

You now have ~12 months to produce a documented conformance posture for your primary web properties. Practical cadence:

  • Months 1-2: automated baseline scan + overlay detection across all public properties. Remove overlays that create litigation exposure.
  • Months 3-6: remediation — contract engineering time against the failed success criteria, batch by section of the site.
  • Months 7-9: manual audit by a qualified professional against any remaining criteria that automation cannot verify.
  • Months 10-12: re-scan, produce VPAT 2.5, publish accessibility statement, file conformance evidence with the ADA coordinator.

Small jurisdictions (under 50,000) + special districts

With ~24 months you can sequence: pilot with one property (months 1-3), roll the process to all properties (months 4-18), run a pre-deadline audit (months 19-21), close remaining findings (months 22-24). The time advantage disappears fast once you add procurement cycles.

Budget guidance (2026 prices)

Per our 2026 WCAG audit cost comparison, a defensible Title II programme for a mid-sized city looks like:

  • Automated continuous scanning: $2,400-$6,000 per year (SMB tier)
  • Engineering remediation: $20,000-$80,000 one-time depending on content volume
  • Manual audit by qualified firm: $5,000-$15,000 per audit cycle
  • ADA coordinator training: $1,500-$5,000 per year

Compare this to the cost profile of even a single federal ADA Title II complaint investigation — typically tens of thousands in remediation + attorney time — and the math is straightforward.

Common pitfalls we see in public-sector procurement

  1. Buying a widget to tick the accessibility box. The FTC's $1M consent order against accessiBe, the UserWay class action, and the AudioEye 10-K risk disclosures all say the same thing: widgets do not meet the standard.
  2. Taking the vendor's compliance score at face value. The number only reflects the automated slice (30-40%). Ask what percentage of WCAG 2.1 AA the vendor's automation covers.
  3. Running one audit and calling it done. The rule applies to the site as it evolves; continuous monitoring is how entities stay in compliance between procurement cycles.

How AccessiScan fits

AccessiScan's Government & Enterprise procurement pack exports a VPAT 2.5 Accessibility Conformance Report automatically from every scan. The Business tier adds continuous monitoring with regression alerts — when a content edit breaks a criterion that was previously passing, the ADA coordinator gets an email within 24 hours. Priced at $199/month, that is 5-10% of what an enterprise platform charges for the same coverage level. Start a free Title II scan on any public URL.

References

  • 28 CFR Part 35, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services
  • DOJ Interim Final Rule, 90 Fed. Reg. (April 2026), extending compliance dates to April 26, 2027 and April 26, 2028
  • WCAG 2.1 W3C Recommendation (June 2018) and WCAG 2.2 W3C Recommendation (October 2023)

Free WCAG scan + VPAT in 60 seconds

No credit card. From $19/month when you need deep scans, continuous monitoring, and an EN 301 549 Conformance Report.

Start a free scan